teorias da conspiração?

[Ibn Erik]

acho piada aos que se negam a admitir haver conspirações, atirando com a pejorativa expressão: teorias da conspiração.

acho piada porque, quem estudar com afinco a história dos serviços secretos dos vários países e até ao longo de milénios, conclui que sempre houve conspirações e sempre houve manipulações para obter determinados resultados políticos.

quando me dizem que eu acredito em teorias da conspiração, num sentido de minimizar o que penso, sorrio. porque há coisas que se sabe e não se pode dizer ou tão pouco provar. senão através de provas circunstanciais.

o problema é sempre o mesmo. as pessoas tèm tendência para acreditar só naquilo que são capazes de compreender e só compreendem acções simples. como alguns jogadores de xadrez, que não conseguem ir além de um movimento. só que há jogadores que conseguem pensar para além dos movimentos de curto prazo e manipulam o adversário para ganhar vantagens evidentes. quem gosta de jogar xadrez entende perfeitamente o que estou a dizer.

da mesma forma, no mundo da política, conspirar e jogar através de movimentos complexos é em si mesmo uma arte. o Maquiavel meteu em livro algumas ideias. tal como antes, de um modo mais simples, o Sun Tzu. e manipular os que desejamos vencer ou convencer é em si mesmo uma arma política só ao alcance de grandes políticos.

outro problema é a crença natural na autoridade. leia-se. seguir líderes e acreditar que as autoridades nunca têm comportamentos anómalos ou maléovolos.

é por demais sabido que, quanto menos respeito temos pela autoridade, um sinal comum aos ditos humanos mais inteligentes, mais temos tendência a acreditar em conspirações e até conspirar. há quem seja inteligente mas seguidor das autoridades. mas esse nível de inteligência acontece sobretudo junto daqueles considerados nerds. ou marrões. seguem os livros mas são incapazes de ver para além do que alguma autoridade lhes ensinam. através do ensino.

mas existem conspirações. elas são mesmo naturais nos seres humanos. claro que os mais sagazes é que são capazes de conspirar. mas para conspirar é preciso acreditar. coisa que a maioria não consegue. ficam-se pelo que lhes transmitem. o que as autoridades lhes transmitem.

mas vão surgindo, aqui e ali, interessantes textos que abrem os olhos aos mais ingénuos. como este, que meterei a seguir.

mas só uma importante observação: as autoridades não são entidades de bem. são entidades que tentam conquistar mais poder e preservar/garantir o que já têm. é por isso que o Estado, por exemplo, terá tendência a crescer sempre, até que o socialismo-comunista da URSS seja quase uma realidade e os próprios alicerces da sociedade se abatem sobre si próprios.

[Ibn Erik]

o tal texto:



Governments From Around the World ADMIT That They Carry Out False Flag Terror

Preface: Please skip to the end of this essay (entitled “Why Should I Care?”) if you want to see why this issue is important to the economy, civil rights, and the political causes which are most important to you.

Yves does not necessarily agree with this essay. Indeed, she may dislike it so much that she bans me from the site. Please send any hate mail to me, not Yves, as I am solely responsible.

So why am I posting this? Because if I don’t have the courage of my convictions to speak unpopular truths, then why should I write at all?

Governments from around the world admit they carry out false flag terror:

* A major with the Nazi SS admitted at the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked attacks on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to justify the invasion of Poland. Nazi general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to setting fire to the German parliament building, and then falsely blaming the communists for the arson

* The CIA admits that it hired Iranians in the 1950’s to pose as Communists and stage bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected prime minister

* Israel admits that an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this)

* The former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” (and see this)(Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred)

* As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960’s, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings. Official State Department documents show that – only nine months before – the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other high-level officials discussed blowing up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an invasion of that country

* An Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian army admit that, in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and see this video; and Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author)

* According to the Washington Post, Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist organization.

* The well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings

* As reported by BBC, the New York Times, and Associated Press, Macedonian officials admit that the government murdered 7 innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order to join the “war on terror”.

* Former Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in 2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having “our intelligence agencies create a false terrorist organization. It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps, and fundraising operations. It could launch fake terrorist operations and claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’ identities and to question the validity of communications.”

* United Press International reported in June 2005:

U.S. intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S. authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of the illegitimacy of the resistance.

Why Should I Care?

You may ask yourself “why should I care?”

You should care because terrorism harms the economy. Specifically, a study by Harvard and the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) points out:

From an economic standpoint, terrorism has been described to have four main effects (see, e.g., US Congress, Joint Economic Committee, 2002). First, the capital stock (human and physical) of a country is reduced as a result of terrorist attacks. Second, the terrorist threat induces higher levels of uncertainty. Third, terrorism promotes increases in counter-terrorism expenditures, drawing resources from productive sectors for use in security. Fourth, terrorism is known to affect negatively specific industries such as tourism.

The Harvard/NBER concludes:

In accordance with the predictions of the model, higher levels of terrorist risks are associated with lower levels of net foreign direct investment positions, even after controlling for other types of country risks. On average, a standard deviation increase in the terrorist risk is associated with a fall in the net foreign direct investment position of about 5 percent of GDP.

Moreover:

Terrorism has contributed to a decline in the global economy (for example, European Commission, 2001).

And see this.

In addition, you should care because terror causes governments to strip liberties and civil rights from the people:

“This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”
- Plato

“If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.”
- U.S. President James Madison

“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
- Adolph Hitler

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
- Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”.
- Josef Stalin

Indeed, the political causes you hold most dear will be derailed if false flag terror is carried out. To see that this is true, let’s take a step back ..

Imagine, if you would, that you were a citizen in Germany right after the example of false flag terror by the Nazis discussed above had occurred. Do you believe you could have stopped the government from invading Poland by reminding Germans that war is bad and peace is good? Do you imagine you could have stopped the brownshirts and loss of domestic rights by writing about the desirability of civil liberties? Do you think that you could have convinced people that protecting the environment, or addressing human or civil rights, or helping the poor, or education, or equality, or any other political crusade was more important than “protecting the Fatherland” when Germans were terrified for their safety?

Please think about it.

The German people were whipped up into a state of hysteria and fear, because they thought they were under attack by Poles and other “bad guys”. The German’s were in shock, and rallied around their “strong” leader (it wasn’t just the bad economy). Without first exposing the truth that the attacks were false flag attacks – which were largely the source and root cause of the German people’s fears, and which allowed the German parliament and other institutions to hand Hitler total power – the sweeping away of good political causes by the wave of fear could not be stopped.

Moreover, the Nazis might have been derailed and perhaps brought to justice well before the Nuremberg trials if the false flag hoaxes had been exposed at the time. The German people could have been spared from the horrors inflicted on their nation and the world by the Nazis. And sanity and positive political changes might have prevailed in 1940’s-era Germany.

Please think about it . . .

Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/02/guest-post-governments-from-around-the-world-admit-that-they-carry-out-false-flag-terror.html

[Ibn Erik]

eu aconselho todos a irem ao link original para seguirem os links, com as provas testemunhais para comprovar estas operações estatais. só não vê quem não quer ou não consegue. o cérebro humano não é igual para todos os cidadãos. uns conseguem ver outros não. uns conseguem perceber determinados acontecimentos, outros não.

há quem tenha capacidades inatas para algumas coisas. como jogar à bola, xadrez, Física ou... detectar movimentos anómalos das autoridades públicas.

meditem nesta caso. quando em Portugal se detectou uma célula da ETA no Algarve, as autoridades portuguesas negaram que fosse uma célula real. e até diziam que a ETA não tem e nunca teve bases em Portugal.

recentemente foi descoberta uma base operacional em... Óbidos. e uma fábrica de armamento da própria ETA.

o que significa isto? significa que as autoridades mentiram antes; que não sabiam; ou estão a manipular a opinião pública.

há uma coisa que poucos sabem. o terrorismo é uma actividade que só sobrevive com o apoio de Estados. portanto, se a ETA ainda existe é porque alguém os continua a apoiar. quem e porquê, fica para cada um descobrir por si mesmo.